|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Vio Geraci
GoonFleet
GoonSwarm
   |
Posted - 2008.05.22 15:51:00 -
[1]
In the case of clear attempts to violate the CSM processes laid out by CCP or obvious mental illnesses causing total breaks with reality, the CSM should be able to call for a vote of no confidence in their Chairman. Like in Hamlet. Express support or discuss criticism of this idea here, thank you.
|
Vio Geraci
GoonFleet
GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2008.05.22 16:22:00 -
[2]
Edited by: Vio Geraci on 22/05/2008 16:23:18
 Originally by: Uzuki Shootmenow
Lets just wait how the council and its members actually contribute and make our game better/worse, before casting a no-confidence vote?
Clearly, because Jade has expressed no concern over GS member issues, this thread has started.
I do not believe any of our issues have even been discussed by the council as of yet. What has happened is that Jade has made clear that his in-game biases and farcical real life political beliefs are going to inform his every decision as the CSM council chairman. Prior to now, I was uncertain as to whether he would conduct himself professionally or not --it has now been demonstrated to my satisfaction that he shall not, and that his emotional problems may prevent him from fulfilling his duties as chairman. He is trying to turn the entire CSM into his own personal dog show.
|
Vio Geraci
GoonFleet
GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2008.05.22 16:52:00 -
[3]
Originally by: Serenity Steele
Quick questions:
1) Given that there is a back-up role of Vice-Chairman, do people think this is still necessary?
2) By what mechanism do you see the Chairman being changed? Vote of the CSM?
1) I'm afraid so. There is the possibility that someone simply impossible to deal with will be elected to the CSM chair, and cause the council to be useless for six months. Something that I would find unfair to the players, and to CSM members who were under the impression that they were going to be participating in a serious council with professional members.
2) I'm open-minded with regards to the solution, I'm especially interested in what the community thinks is an appropriate way to do it. Perhaps by the unanimous support of all CSM representatives. There needs to be some sort of mechanism by which this can occur, and at present there is none.
|
Vio Geraci
GoonFleet
GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2008.05.22 16:53:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Heartstone
To quote what I said in the other no confidence thread
"Votes have been cast. Don't like it? Vote for someone else next time. Didn't vote? STFU."
While I'm sure your CEO appreciates your partisanship, dismissing a serious issue like this will not do the CSM or the general EVE player base any favors.
|
|
|
| |
|